Marx no nos dice nada, ni en pro ni en contra y por ello debemos usar nuestro cerebro.Maquiavelo pensaba en dicho reformador, pero en su tiempo no era posible.Es una nueva relacin entre teora y praxis, porque es una relacin nueva entre cultura y masas, entre intelectuales y masas.Marx haba estudiado su anatoma indicando sus bases fundamentales.
Antonio Gramsci Maquiavelo Y Lenin Pro Ni EnCon el desarrollo del capitalismo monopolista y particularmente del capitalismo monopolista de estado, la distincin gramsciana entre intelectual tradicional e intelectual orgnico tiende a superarse, dada la forma como el capitalismo liga hoy a su vida tambin a los intelectuales humanistas. Antonio Gramsci Maquiavelo Y Lenin Upgrade Your BrowserTo browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. Antonio Gramsci Maquiavelo Y Lenin Download Antonio GramsciHerrera-Zgaib Download with Google Download with Facebook or create a free account to download Antonio Gramsci texto completo Download Antonio Gramsci texto completo M. Herrera-Zgaib Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Both Schmitt and Gramsci focused on the sources, conditions, content, and scope of the originating power of a collective will. While the former located it in the constituent power of the sovereign people, the latter placed it in the popular-national will of the modern hegemon. Both thinkers explored the complex and perplexing relationship between radical founding acts and modern democratic politics in a secular age, that is of democratic legitimacy, where with the entrance of the masses into the political sphere, the references to ultimate foundation s of authority and to an extra-social source of political power had begun to appear more dubious than ever. The last section of the article develops a notion of hegemonic sovereignty defined as an expansive and positing democratic constituent prince, aiming, through founding, total decisions, at the overall, radical, explicit, and lucid institution of society. The article briefly shows how the concept of hegemonic sovereignty can solve some problems pertaining to Schmitts notion of sovereignty and to Gramscis theory of hegemony. In so doing, the article seeks to establish the mutually reinforcing qualities of the two concepts. En Representative democracy and its limits (pp. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Polity. New Brunswick, Canad: Rutgers University. Trabajo original publicado en 1932). Berlin, Alemania: Duncker and Humblot. ![]() Lassman y R. Speirs, Eds.). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |